North Dakota Gov. Burgum signs bills to aid pregnant women in wake of abortion ruling – InForum
BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers sent a raft of legislation to Gov. Doug Burgum for aid to pregnant women in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling.
The ruling overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, prompting a lawsuit over North Dakota’s 2007 trigger ban. The dozen or so pieces of legislation are aligned with a call last year from the North Dakota Catholic Conference tabbed “responding with love.”
“Building a culture of life means making abortion unthinkable,” the organization said in a
last year. “This will require all parts of society to reexamine and address what they can do so that no woman ever feels that the death of her child is the answer to any situation. Businesses, families, churches, charities, and governments must support and implement policies and practices that are pro-family, pro-woman, and pro-child.”
The Legislature passed bills to:
- Consider studying utilization of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, in Senate Bill
. The original bill was identical to House Bill
, which sought to increase the program’s eligibility level, but the Senate killed 1036 and advanced the study version of 2291.
- Ban “forced or coerced” abortions, in House Bill
- Create an adoption tax credit and a tax credit for contributions to a maternity home, child-placing agency or pregnancy help center, in House Bill
- Exempt children’s diapers from sales taxes, in House Bill
- Provide $262,000 for the state Department of Health and Human Services to reimburse nonprofit child-placing agencies for costs of completing home study reports, in House Bill
- Make clear that the state’s employment discrimination law protecting pregnant workers covers those with medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth, in House Bill
- Expand Medicaid assistance and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families for pregnant women, in Senate Bill 2181. The House killed Senate Bill
, which sought to expand Medicaid coverage for low-income pregnant women, and was combined into
- Provide $1 million for alternatives to abortion, in Senate Bill
- Develop a pregnancy and parenting resource website run by HHS, in Senate Bill
. Senate Bill
initially proposed the website, but the House killed the bill, and incorporated the website into 2012, the HHS budget.
- Designate Jan. 22 as “Right-to-Life Day,” in House Bill
Gov. Doug Burgum has signed all of these bills except Senate bills 2129 and 2181. He has until May 19 to act on all remaining bills from the session.
Burgum last week signed Senate Bill
, revising North Dakota’s near-total abortion ban, including provisions that aim to address doctors’ fears of prosecution and to respond to a recent state Supreme Court
The bill took effect as law immediately, and is bound to become part of an ongoing lawsuit over the state’s ban.
“This bill clarifies and refines existing state law which was triggered into effect by the (U.S. Supreme Court) Dobbs decision and reaffirms North Dakota as a pro-life state,” Burgum said in a statement.
Under the initial abortion ban, doctors could be charged with a Class C felony for performing an abortion during medical emergencies and in cases of rape or incest, but they could argue in court that the affirmative defenses for rape, incest and protection of the life of a mother outlined in the law protect them from criminal liability.
The revised law changes the ban’s affirmative defenses into exceptions, which supporters say would take the legal burden off medical providers.
The law also allows for abortions for rape and incest, but only before six weeks gestation. Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, one of the Legislature’s most ardent anti-abortion lawmakers, has said “this was already law, no changes.”
Democrats and some Republicans in the Legislature opposed the six weeks provision as insufficient for women and girls who might not know they are pregnant after being raped.
The law allows for treatment of ectopic pregnancies, a dangerous, nonviable scenario in which a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus, and molar pregnancies, a nonviable, rare complication involving a tumor forming in the uterus.
The Red River Women’s Clinic is challenging the trigger law. The clinic was North Dakota’s sole abortion provider before moving last summer from Fargo to neighboring Moorhead, Minnesota, where abortion is still legal.
The lawsuit continues in North Dakota District Court after the state Supreme Court’s March
upholding a judge’s temporary block of the trigger law.
Chief Justice Jon Jensen wrote in the court’s majority opinion that “The North Dakota Constitution guarantees North Dakota citizens the right to enjoy and defend life and the right to pursue and obtain safety, which necessarily includes a pregnant woman has a fundamental right to obtain an abortion to preserve her life or her health.”
The law creates a new chapter in statute for its provisions, and redefines a “medical emergency” as a “serious health risk.”
Molar pregnancy treatment and “serious health risk” were amendments in response to the ruling.
- House provides legal shield for abortion seekers, providers | News
- Colorado Supreme Court weighs discipline for divorce attorney: 'I've never seen anything like that' | Subscriber-Only Content
- Mass shootings renew efforts to target gun manufacturers' legal shield
- Bauer-Kahan's Bill Creating Legal Shield for Abortion Heads to the Governor
- House gives legal shield to abortion seekers, providers | Boston